PacePortfolio prioritisation
Anonymised demo data

Where to put effort next

Every opportunity scored against the same criteria and ranked by the agreed weightings. Move a weighting and the ranking moves with it.

28 / 28

In view

28

28 with a named sponsor

Scoring 50+

9

Worth a business case first

Average score

35.8/ 100

Agreed weightings

Indicative investment

£6.95m

Cost band midpoints, not a budget

Portfolio map

Alignment × benefits; bubble size is cost band, colour is complexity. Top right is where the return is easiest to argue.

  • High
  • Medium
  • Low
cost bandSelect a bubble to open it
0255075100Strategic alignment — share of all criteria met (%)None / unknownNon-tangibleMedium tangibleHigh tangibleProject Lumen — unified data p…Matter experience databaseGlobal business services centre

Weightings

Change what the firm cares about; the ladder responds.

5%
10%
25%
25%
10%
10%
15%

Dials total 100%

Categories and criteria are editable on the scoring model page.

Strategic alignment by category

Average share of each category's criteria met. A short arm is a category the portfolio is not serving.

2550751001170Areas of focusClientsExpansion &globalfootprintIncreasingrevenue &profitabilityPeople &cultureInnovation &servicedeliveryOperationalinfrastructure

Distributions

Benefits assessment

  • High tangible829%
  • Medium tangible932%
  • Non-tangible1139%
  • None / unknown00%

Cost bands

  • <£50K829%
  • £50–£150K1036%
  • £150–£300K27%
  • £300–£500K27%
  • >£500K621%
  • Unknown00%